Modern Radio Laboratories
® /Alfred P. Morgan Mash-up
|
|
Making the coils.
Taking the mystery out of what wire goes where. |
|
|
Elmer Osterhoudt and Alfred P. Morgan both give
instructions on how to wind the coils and both are hard to
comprehend. Morgan advises to just buy the coils, but
gives instructions on how to wind a coil on a Bakelite coil form.
Elmer wants you to follow the diagram on the left, drawn in his
typical style with no perspective. Are you going to buy blank coil forms and wire, and try to
wind a coil based on this perplexing drawing? Better just buy the coils already made from MRL. This lousy drawing
is good marketing.
The superior drawing in Morgan's book is still
confusing. Above, on the far right, pins 1 and 2 on the coil are closest to
you, and pins 2 and 3 are the fat pins. Once you see
that one fat pin is in the rear, the drawing becomes clearer.
|
|
|
|
|
The
circle in Elmer's drawing is the socket. If you mentally tilt
the circle and compare it with the Morgan socket, "P" is pin 1. |
|
|
|
These drawings, from two
articles in Radio Builders Manual
published in 1934, show the same pin connections as in
Morgan's drawing. (Ignore the letters and follow the coil connections to
the pins.) Note that the coils are rotated a quarter turn when compared
with the Morgan drawing. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is so confusing to me
that I edited the drawing. Each coil is
connected to a fat pin and a thin pin and both
are wound in the same direction. It doesn't
matter which direction as long as they are both
the same. The tickler can be on the top or the
bottom. You can't just pick any pin to start, or
you may end up with the grid and tickler coils
reversed. |
|
|
|
|
The Morgan coil
drawing simplified. |
|
|
|
Another way to
visualize the connections.
The picture on the right shows the bottom of the coil. |
|
To complete the confusion, the numbers on a four
pin socket don't match up with the numbers in
Morgan's drawings. If I had never seen a real coil, I'm not sure I could
make one based on these drawings.
This explains the guys who say, "I built one of these when I was 10
years old. I've spent my career in electronics thanks to Alfred P.
Morgan." These kids were winding radio coils from
incomprehensible instructions. It is no wonder they were successful
in life. (Actually, one guy who built the Morgan set told me he
became a Geologist, so the "career in electronics" theory is not
rock solid. Get it? "rock" solid. Never mind.) |
The coils are "standard" in the pin configuration. (The only reason
I state this is that Morgan said to buy the coils, and if there
wasn't some standard at the time, the radio wouldn't work.) A 1935
Bud Radio Products catalog states that their coils can be
used in any circuit specifying a four prong coil, so this
configuration dates back at least to 1935, and Elmer Osterhoudt had
been making them since 1932.
|
|
There are two
small pins and two large pins. Logically, you'd think that the big
coil would connect to the big pins and the small coil would connect
to the small pins, but that's not the standard. Each coil is
connected to a small pin and a large pin.
So why is that? A four pin vacuum tube has the filament on the fat
pins. If a coil was wound across the fat pins and you
accidentally plugged it into a tube socket, it would heat up
while putting a dead short across the source of the filament
voltage. There would be a contest inside the radio to see
which would turn into a puff of smoke first; the
transformer, the coil, or the wires going to the tube
socket. |
|
|
|
|
|
The pin connections of the two
coils (compare to the drawings). Wind
both coils in the same direction. For example, if you wind the
primary coil down from the top, starting on pin 1 and ending on pin
2, then also wind the
tickler down from the top, starting on pin 3 and end on pin 4. Both
coils must be wound in the same
direction or the radio won't oscillate. Leave 1/8" between the two windings. |
|
|
|
Here's another way to visualize it. |
|
|
Another Mystery Solved |
|
|
The logic behind the pin out
designations on a coil is that the coil used a
tube socket. When you look at a
schematic or pictorial of an old radio, the designations on
the coil don't seem to make much sense unless
you see the coil together with a vacuum tube, as
shown above. F plus and minus are the
connections to the filament battery on the
vacuum tube, but the coil socket has the same
labels.
NOTE: The pinout of the coil above does not
agree with what we have found to be the
"standard" coil. P and F+ seem to go to the
smaller, or "tickler" coil instead of the larger
coil. |
|
|
|
|
A set of MRL coils.
|
Elmer put the tickler winding on the top, Alfred Morgan put his on the bottom. It
doesn't really matter as long as you wind the primary and tickler coils
in the same direction.
The MRL coils wind upward, the Morgan coils wind downward. In other
words, Elmer made a hole near the bottom of the coil form, pushed a
wire through it and into pin 1. He then wound the coil up towards
the top. Morgan did
the opposite; he made a hole in the top of the coil form, pushed a
wire through it and
into pin 1, and then wound it towards the bottom. |
|
|
|
A set of BUD coils from the 1920s.
Though both of these sets are color coded, there was no
industry standard for the colors. The fact that the red (and
possibly the green) coils are similar is either a coincidence, or
Elmer adopted a color scheme from another manufacturer. |
|
|
|
"OCTO" brand four pin coils. Red, blue, brown and green.
The red and brown probably tune similarly to
the red and brown BUD coils, but not the blue and green. The tickler
winding are on top, like the MRL coils.
Photo
by Emil Sarlija |
Here is
MRL / Morgan comparison data for the AM Broadcast Band coils. Two coils are needed to cover
the band. |
|
|
|
Variable
Cap |
Primary Coil turns |
Wire
Gauge |
Tickler Coil turns |
Wire
Gauge |
COIL 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
MRL |
10 -
140 |
84 |
28 |
14 |
28 |
Morgan |
10 -
365 |
70 |
30 |
20 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COIL 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
MRL |
10 -
140 |
170 |
34 |
25 |
34 |
Morgan |
10 -
365 |
150 |
34 |
45 |
34 |
|
Notice Morgan uses less turns on the primary and
more on the secondary, but he used a variable capacitor that is
double the value Osterhoudt used. Osterhoudt tells us the first MRL
coil will tune from 950 kHz to 2100 kHz and the second coil tunes
from 436 kHz to 1000 kHz. The forms are 1 3/8" in diameter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To wind the coil you need tension on
the wire. This can be done by passing the wire through a hole in a
clothespin (an idea from one of Elmer's handbooks).
Scrape the insulation from the end of the wire. Drill or melt (with
a hot pin) a hole
in the top of the coil form, pass the wire through the clothespin,
into the hole, and into pin 1.
Heat the pin with a soldering iron. Solder will wick into the
hole, soldering the wire to the pin.
When the coil is wound, hold it in place with a piece of tape. Drill
or melt a hole in the form, scrape the insulation from the end of the wire, and pass the
wire through the hole and into pin 2. |
|
|
|
- Click on image -
MRL coil winder from HB-6 "How To Make Coils."
|
After you wind the main coil, wind the tickler coil
in the same manner. I found that trying to get the bottom tickler
winding wire into pin 4 was almost impossible due to how close the
hole in the bottom of the coil form was to the pin. The fix for this
is to hold the winding in place with a piece of tape and leave about
a foot of wire on the end. Scrape off the insulation at the
appropriate place. Push the wire through the hole in the form, bring
it out the top, then loop it around and insert it into the pin. Pull
it tight and solder. |
|
|
|
The completed coil. It tunes from below the broadcast band up to about 1100 kHz.
Two coils are needed to cover the entire band. |
|
|
The second coil, on the left. It tunes from
around 900 kHz to 1750 kHz. Next to it is an MRL coil that covers
about the same range. I try not to handle the Elmer Osterhoudt MRL coils too much.
The coil on the left is wound on an MRL form made by Paul Nelson in
2015. |
|
|
|